Illustrative case study / PLANERGY AI methodology example

SEEING THE BOARD

What 30 Days of Workforce AI Adoption Can Reveal

Most organisations see AI one tool, one team or one experiment at a time. PLANERGY AI looks across the organisation. By examining work at individual, role, team and department level — then cross-referencing those perspectives — PLANERGY AI can reveal patterns that are difficult to see from inside any one function.

The result is not simply a list of AI opportunities. It is a clearer view of the board.

01 — The pieces

30 people. 30 perspectives.

Each participant contributes structured information about the work they actually do — not a survey of opinions, but evidence about how the organisation operates.

Recurring work

Workflow friction

Current AI use

Time spent

Handoffs

Checking and rework

Approvals

Systems and tools

Capability and confidence

Opportunities for improvement

Confidential participant responses remain appropriately protected and are not simply exposed to management. The purpose is to understand the work — not to monitor individuals.

02 — The patterns

Individual observations become organisational patterns.

PLANERGY AI cross-references participant information across five levels — so what one person experiences can be tested against what the whole organisation is doing.

  1. Individual
  2. Role
  3. Team
  4. Department
  5. Organisation

Duplicated work

Parallel reporting

Repeated data entry

Repeated checking

Unnecessary handoffs

Reformatting between departments

Fragmented AI use

Capability concentrated in particular people

Skilled staff performing low-value administrative work

Bottlenecks

Inconsistent processes

Repeated approvals

System gaps

Potential overcompensation

Repetition is not automatically waste.

PLANERGY AI does not automatically classify repeated work or controls as waste. Apparent duplication may be intentional and necessary for:

  • Governance
  • Segregation of duties
  • Financial controls
  • Safety
  • Quality assurance
  • Regulatory requirements
  • Human accountability

PLANERGY AI identifies the pattern, investigates why it exists, and distinguishes necessary control activity from potentially unnecessary compensating work.

03 — Overcompensation

When people compensate for the system

People are resourceful. When a process, handoff or system falls short, capable staff quietly absorb the gap — and the organisation keeps moving, often without noticing why.

Weak data process

Multiple teams end up verifying the same information because no one fully trusts its source.

Unreliable handoff

Extra meetings appear so people can confirm what the handoff should have made clear.

Poor system integration

People manually re-enter the same data between systems that were never connected.

Low trust in reporting

Several layers of checking accumulate around numbers nobody fully believes.

Unclear process

Experienced staff compensate through personal knowledge, private spreadsheets and workarounds.

These behaviours may keep the organisation functioning — but they can conceal the underlying structural problem. PLANERGY AI looks for the root workflow issue before recommending automation.

Automating compensation is not the same as improving the system.

04 — Illustrative example

From 30 people to one board.

A fictional organisation with 30 program participants across Operations, Finance, HR, Customer Service and Management.

Illustrative / synthetic example — not client results

30

program participants across five departments

~80

individual workflow observations initially surfaced

Fewer

shared organisational patterns after cross-referencing — many observations point to the same underlying causes

Illustrative / synthetic example — not client results

Reporting & assurance pattern

11 participants. Three departments. One pattern.

Eleven participants across Finance, Operations and Management identify related reporting activities. The observed pattern:

  1. Entered
  2. Reformatted
  3. Checked
  4. Summarised
  5. Checked again
  6. Management reporting

Potential overcompensation

Three verification stages may be compensating for one underlying data-confidence issue.

Illustrative workforce burden

Approximately 30 hours per month across the sampled workflows.

Potential response

Investigate the underlying information flow before creating separate AI automations for each individual task.

Human judgement retained

Final interpretation, exception handling and management approval.

05 — The position

See the organisation as a system.

PLANERGY AI combines the evidence into a single organisational view — the position on the board.

People
Workflows
AI Use
Systems
Controls
Capability
Friction
Dependencies
Opportunities
Implementation
Measurement
Impact
PLANERGY AI strategic board with a luminous gold centre square

06 — The moves

Not every opportunity should be automated.

Once the board is visible, PLANERGY AI helps determine the right move for each part of the position.

What should remain human

What AI can assist

What can be standardised

What requires workflow redesign first

What requires stronger controls

What should not be automated

What can be implemented now

What belongs in the next 90-day position

The objective is not maximum automation. The objective is better organisational performance through practical, responsible and measurable AI adoption.

07 — Measurement

Measure the new position.

PLANERGY AI compares baseline and post-implementation evidence so change is demonstrated rather than assumed.

Workflow time

Frequency

Adoption

Repeat use

Quality

Rework

Implementation status

Governance controls

Observed capacity released

Observed evidence and extrapolated estimates are always kept separate. Time released is reported in hours and is not equated with cash savings unless an approved financial model supports that conclusion.

08 — The 30-day view

From thirty participants to the next position.

The complete journey — from individual evidence to a governed, measured organisational view.

  1. 0130 Participants
  2. 02Work + AI Assessment
  3. 03Workflow Discovery
  4. 04Cross-Participant Analysis
  5. 05Cross-Department Patterns
  6. 06Opportunity Map
  7. 07Controls + Approval
  8. 08Workflow Implementation
  9. 09Measurement
  10. 10The Board
  11. 1190-Day Next Position
ExecutionDirectionIntentionForesight

See the board before you decide the next move.

AI adoption becomes more valuable when leaders can see more than individual tools and isolated experiments. PLANERGY AI helps organisations understand how work, people, systems, controls and AI interact — then turn that understanding into practical action and measurable improvement.

Return to PLANERGY AI